In a recent development that has sparked concern, Tasmania's gaming regulator has voiced strong opposition to the state government's new poker machine policies, claiming they will exacerbate harm for problem gamblers. This article delves into the implications of these policies and the potential consequences for Tasmania's gambling landscape.
The Controversial Policies
The Tasmanian government, led by Treasurer Eric Abetz, unveiled a series of measures in January, including the introduction of ATMs in venues, a ticket-in ticket-out (TITO) system, and facial recognition technology. While these policies were intended to address harm reduction, the gaming commission believes they will have the opposite effect.
Commission's Concerns
In letters obtained by ABC, the commission expressed several reservations. They argued that access to ATMs within venues could lead to "greater harm" as it provides an immediate response to chasing losses. The TITO system, designed to reduce harm, was also questioned, with the commission citing evidence suggesting it could result in a 20% increase in spending. Additionally, the commission warned of potential money laundering risks associated with the TITO system.
Staggered Trading Hours
Another policy change involves reducing the operating hours of pokies venues from 20 to 17 hours daily. However, the commission advocated for uniform trading hours across all venues, citing evidence of problem gamblers moving between venues during the early hours, exacerbating harm.
Treasurer's Defense
Mr. Abetz defended the new measures, emphasizing their proportionality, practicality, and respect for personal agency. He disagreed with the commission's assessment of the TITO system, arguing that it doesn't increase available funds but rather enables modern system controls. The introduction of ATMs, according to Abetz, would assist in enforcing limits and supporting facial recognition technology.
Pokies Losses and Political Support
Pokies losses have been on the rise since the end of COVID, with players losing over $17.7 million in May alone. The hospitality sector, which opposed the mandatory pre-commitment card, appears supportive of the new policies. Labor, too, has expressed support, having previously opposed the pre-commitment card.
Lack of Consultation and Expert Warnings
Independent MP Meg Webb, an advocate for pokies harm reduction, criticized the government for not seeking advice from the independent gaming commission. She highlighted that the commission's warnings about the potential harm caused by these measures have been deliberately ignored.
Deeper Analysis
The new policies raise questions about the balance between harm reduction and industry interests. While the government aims to reduce financial burdens on venues, the potential harm to problem gamblers cannot be overlooked. The introduction of ATMs and the TITO system, despite good intentions, may inadvertently create an environment that encourages excessive spending. Additionally, the lack of consultation with the gaming commission, an independent expert body, raises concerns about the decision-making process.
Conclusion
Tasmania's new poker machine policies have ignited a debate over harm reduction and the role of the state in regulating gambling. While the government's intentions may be well-meaning, the potential consequences for problem gamblers and the broader community cannot be ignored. This situation highlights the complex nature of gambling regulation and the need for careful consideration of expert advice to strike a balance between industry interests and public well-being.
